Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 05:21
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Exposure sites announced after second measles case confirmed in Grand Traverse County - WPBN
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Instagram for iPad is reportedly coming soon; here’s when to expect it - 9to5Mac
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Who are your 5 top Hollywood Silver Screen legends?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What might be the social consequences of an ethnic as opposed to a civic conception of the nation?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
California doctor to plead guilty to supplying Matthew Perry with ketamine - BBC
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why did my ex-narcissist move so fast with his new supply marriage engagement moving in, etc.?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?